Xpu-Ha Oasis
47 fully-serviced lots in the eighth and final phase of Xpuha Beach Residential Resort, sold at today's price while earlier phases of the same development resell below list.
Oasis is the eighth and final phase of Xpuha Beach Residential Resort, a 47-lot section sold by IPPO KANP, S.A. de C.V. Lots run 600-660 m² / 6,458-7,104 sq ft, carry underground electricity, concrete streets and water and drainage already installed, and sit under a notarized condominium regime rather than the ejido (communally held land) or usucapión (legal claim through long, uncontested possession) land status common to other lot developments in this catalogue. The product is the serviced lot: a buyer commissions their own house, or one of the developer’s referred architecture studios, subject to the design guidelines below.
Source: FAQs.pdf / FAQs-Eng.pdf; LISTA DE PRECIOS JULIO26.pdf; LINEAMIENTOS DE DISEÑO OASIS.pdf; Escritura (public deed) Régimen Condominio Oasis (21-Nov-2024). All developer-issued. Checked 26-Aug-2026.
It fits you if
You want to design and build your own house rather than buy a finished one: the lot is the product, and the developer’s design guidelines (35% C.O.S., 105% C.U.S., 3 levels including a roof garden) set the envelope you build inside.
You want infrastructure already in the ground, not a promise of it: underground electricity, concrete streets, LED lighting, water, drainage and a treatment plant are described as installed today, per the developer’s own FAQ.
You’re comfortable with a condominium’s design-approval process rather than a free hand: a construction committee reviews every project and a vigilance committee approves it, and once you start building you have 14 months to finish, per the FAQ.
You want the financing side documented in numbers, not a verbal pitch: a dated payment table (June 2026) names six tiers by exact percentage, term and discount. All six are counted below.
It doesn't if
You need a single, final maintenance fee before you commit. The developer’s own documents disagree by roughly 30-40x, and the FAQ says the real number is still pending a condominium vote. See the discrepancy below, not resolved into one figure.
You need to know today whether a pool counts toward the 105% construction ceiling. Nothing in the design guideline says either way; it only sets the pool’s setback from the lot line.
You need the lot-type letters (A, B, C, P) explained. The price list uses them to set price more than size does, and nothing in the shared folder defines what distinguishes them.
You want Selvamía’s price list, legal status or availability count alongside its design rules. This analysis now has Selvamía’s own design guideline (see the comparison below), but not a price list, escritura or unit count: it is marketed under what appears to be a different developer entity than Oasis, and only Oasis’s own Drive was open to FEUDO for this project.
Two phases into the same development are already reselling below list.
Xpuha Beach Residential Resort has nine named phases that no single public source numbers in order: Estrella de Mar (confirmed as phase one), Coral, Duna, Palma, Brisa, Arrecife, Caracol, Selvamía and Oasis (confirmed as the eighth and last). The developer sells Oasis, the final phase, at today’s list price. Two of the earliest phases are already changing hands for less than the developer originally charged, and three separate sightings of the same inventory, dated four months apart, show the price moving before it moved back down.
20-Apr-2026
Rozr, playainvestments.mx
Estrella de Mar, phase 1: a 600 m² / 6,458 sq ft lot advertised at $2,900,000 MXN.
25-Jul-2026
Angely Machado, Top Investments Real Estate
Estrella de Mar lots (600-707.55 m² / 6,458-7,615 sq ft) quoted $3,000,000-$4,200,000 MXN; Coral lot 90 (602 m² / 6,480 sq ft) quoted $3,900,000 MXN. No discount marked on any of these lines.
14-Aug-2026
Karla Maciel, Top Investments Real Estate
The same two lots, marked down: Estrella de Mar lot 47 (707.55 m² / 7,615 sq ft) from $4,200,000 to $2,900,000 MXN, a 31% cut; Coral lot 90 (602 m² / 6,480 sq ft) from $3,900,000 to $3,200,000 MXN, an 18% cut.
Twenty days pass between the 25-Jul list and the 14-Aug markdown. The lot numbers don’t line up across all three sightings (April’s ad names no lot, just "600 m², phase 1"; the August markdown is specifically lot 47, at 707.55 m²), so this isn’t proof of one lot’s price cycling up and back down. What it shows is narrower and still worth seeing: the $2,900,000 MXN headline already existed in April, months before the same phase was quoted as high as $4,200,000 in July with no discount marked, then cut back down to that same $2,900,000 figure in August. The ceiling appeared and came back down to a floor that was already public four months earlier.
None of this says anyone did anything wrong, and none of it says Oasis is priced wrong. A finished, serviced final phase with a notarized condominium regime is a different, more de-risked product than a resale lot from 2021-era phase one, and the two aren’t interchangeable. What it says is that this market moves differently than a brochure describes it: the same inventory gets quoted at different prices within months, sometimes below what the developer originally charged for it, and a buyer who sees only today’s list price is seeing one frame of a moving picture. The same master broker advertising the development (2-Jul-2026) separately quotes an entry price "from $3,150 MXN/m²" with financing up to three years interest-free, a figure closer to the discounted resales than to Oasis’s own list.
Sources: phase order and status from a WAM broker-offer monitor, Feb-Aug 2026 (Rozr / playainvestments.mx, 20-Apr-2026; master broker Macbeth García, 2-Jul-2026; Angely Machado, Top Investments Real Estate, 25-Jul-2026; Karla Maciel, Top Investments Real Estate, 14-Aug-2026), cross-checked against the developer’s own Drive folders reachable from those offers. Not documents the developer itself published on this project.
Where this sits in what the zone actually moves.
Not a valuation. Where this project’s asking price sits against other land in the Akumal/Xpu-Ha corridor, and whether buyers are actually asking in that band.
Asking price per m², land in the Akumal / Xpu-Ha corridor (n=5)
Built condo product excluded: price per m² is not comparable between a lot and a finished unit. Built product in the same corridor runs USD 2,600-5,800/m² in the same monitor, for scale, and is not ranked alongside land here. Of these five, four are Preconstrucción (pre-sale, before the developer has finished building): Lunara, Xpu-Há Beach Residential Resort (general), Nahal Akumal and Amarés Riviera Maya. Only Oasis, this project, is marked Venta (a finished, deliverable product) in the same monitor. Comparing a finished lot against four pre-sale promises without saying so would flatter the promises: this monitor’s full catalogue runs 336 Preconstrucción against 179 Venta listings, so the imbalance in this chart’s five comparables matches what the wider zone looks like too.
- XPUHA OASIS (this project)387
- Xpu-Há Beach Residential Resort (general)336
- Lunara, Akumal283
- Nahal Akumal253
- Amarés Riviera Maya, Puerto Aventuras215
Highest of the five land comparables this monitor tracks in the corridor, including the wider Xpu-Ha Beach Residential Resort listing itself. That premium is consistent with Oasis being the most finished product of the five: a notarized condominium regime and installed infrastructure, against raw or lightly-serviced land at the others.
Buyer requests in Xpu-Ha, by price band
May-Jun against Jul-Aug 2026, land and house budgets touching this project’s USD 206,000-310,000 range. Sample sizes are small (1-3 requests per band): a direction, not a statistically firm read.
USD 150-250k (land)
the low end of this project’s range
USD 250-400k (house)
mixed land/house budget, this project’s upper range
Requests at the top of this project’s range (house-budget territory) dropped to zero in Jul-Aug, while the lower land band picked up its only recorded request. On numbers this small that could be noise; it is not enough to call a trend.
Source: FEUDO’s own broker-request monitor (usd_m2 by development) and demand-band tracker (requests by zone, product type and price band, May-Aug 2026). It measures what brokers wrote down, which is not the whole market and skews toward what circulates between agents. A read on direction, not a valuation, and no price on this page was derived from it.
Last to sell, not last in line.
The FAQ calls Oasis "the eighth and final phase" of Xpuha Beach Residential Resort. That describes the order phases went to market, not their position on the ground: the developer’s own masterplan, dated September 2024 and filed inside this project’s own Drive folder, places Oasis roughly in the middle of the property, between Arrecife and Coral and next to the sports club, with Estrella de Mar, Caracol and the main highway access further south and Brisa, Palma and Duna further north.
That same masterplan names a phase this analysis had not seen documented before: Sereno, positioned near the beach club, past the highway crossing. It also carries its own section named Selvamía, printed with its own logo across manzanas MZ-12 and MZ-13, inside the "Etapa 2" block to the north. Master broker Macbeth García’s 2-Jul-2026 message (the same one cited above for the "$3,150 MXN/m²" entry price) lists Selvamía’s preventa (pre-sale) inventory as "Caracol, Selvamia MZ12, Selvamia MZ13, Selvamia MZ15": read together with the map, Selvamía occupies manzanas 12, 13 and 15, the third of which the map leaves unlabeled. This map is roughly two years old relative to the July-2026 price list; treat the layout as directional, not current inventory. Selvamía is developed under Grupo Entorno, an entity separate from Oasis’s own IPPO KANP, and its currently active inventory sits in manzana 13, per master broker Zold58 (11-Feb-2026). Grupo Entorno’s own design guideline for Selvamía is compared against Oasis’s figures in the next section.
Source: "Masterplan" (Xpu-Ha Beach, dated Septiembre 2024), filed in this project’s Drive under "9. Renders". Distances the same map prints from its own main access (Tulum 42.2 km, Puerto Aventuras 5 km, Playa del Carmen 27.4 km) are close to, but not identical to, FEUDO’s own routed distances below.
The real gap with Selvamía isn’t the percentage. It’s the 20-meter setback.
Selvamía runs on its own design guideline, issued by its own developer, Grupo Entorno, and it sets a tighter building allowance than Oasis on every coefficient: 15% C.O.S. against Oasis’s 35%, 30% C.U.S. against Oasis’s 105%. Read only those two numbers and Selvamía looks like it buys less than half the house. The line that actually decides where a house can sit is the rear setback: 20.0 meters at Selvamía against 8.0 meters at Oasis, two and a half times deeper. On a similarly sized lot, that setback alone removes far more usable footprint than the percentage gap suggests on its own.
| Rule | Oasis (Apr-2023) | Selvamía (Feb-2025) |
|---|---|---|
| C.O.S. (ground-floor coverage) | 35% max. | 15% max., "contemplating all buildable areas at ground level, no exceptions" |
| C.U.S. (total buildable, all levels) | 105% max. | 30% max. |
| Height / levels | 10 m, 3 levels (incl. roof garden) | 7.50 m, 2 levels |
| Front setback (frente) | 5.0 m, habitable surface only | 5.0 m, any construction and habitable surface alike |
| Rear setback (fondo) | 8.0 m | 20.0 m |
| Side setbacks (laterales) | 1.50 m, each side | 2.0 m, each side |
| Perimeter lots (colindancias) | 12.50 m free of construction on any lot bordering the condominium perimeter | Deferred to each lot’s own individual sheet; no figure given |
| Fences and gates | Prohibited at the frontage, with no width figure in that line | Prohibited at the frontage; vehicle entrance 3.50 m max. |
| Parking | 2 spaces (150-250 m² built), 3 (over 251 m²), plus one 2.50 x 5.00 m space in projection | 2 spaces (150-250 m² built), 3 (over 251 m²), plus 1 visitor space per lot |
| Roofs and facade | Slope of 15% minimum, domes and vaults; no palapas (open-sided structures under a thatched palm roof) on the main structure | No sloped slabs, tiles or domes on the main facade; palapas and light structures allowed |
| Tree relocation | At least 75% of trees over 10 cm diameter, within the property | At least 85%, within the property |
| Pool setback | 1.0 m from the lot line; silent on whether it counts toward C.U.S. | 2.0 m from the lot line; may sit outside the building envelope entirely, provided it still clears the 20 m rear and 2 m side setbacks |
| Maintenance fee (parametric estimate) | 1.50 USD/m²/year | 1.50 USD/m²/year, the identical figure |
The pool question, unresolved for Oasis (its own guideline sets a setback but never says whether pool surface counts toward the buildable percentage), is settled in writing for Selvamía: a pool "may sit outside the construction perimeter permitted for the home," as long as it still clears the 20-meter rear and 2-meter side setbacks. That written answer supersedes an earlier, unpublished verbal figure this analysis had heard from a sales call and does not repeat here.
Source: "LINEAMIENTOS DE DISEÑO - SELVAMIA. Actualizado.pdf" (Febrero 2025), Grupo Entorno, shared from a Drive belonging to Zold58, the wider development’s master broker, not this project’s own developer folder. Oasis figures from "LINEAMIENTOS DE DISEÑO OASIS.pdf" (Abril 2023), cited earlier on this page. This is a comparison of two published design guidelines, not a valuation or a recommendation between the two phases.
Four questions to settle before you sign.
Each one comes straight out of the developer’s own documents. Open any for what they say, why it moves the decision, and how it gets settled.
Question 1 of 4
The lot is 35% buildable. Is that the number that decides how much house fits?
No. The number that matters is 105%, and it is more than double the first one.
Read the reasoning +Close −
The developer’s own design guidelines (LINEAMIENTOS DE DISEÑO OASIS.pdf, dated April 2023) set two separate percentages: C.O.S. (Coeficiente de Ocupación del Suelo) at 35% maximum, defined as "the surface of the lot that can be built on at ground level", and C.U.S. (Coeficiente de Utilización del Suelo) at 105% maximum, defined as "the maximum surface to be built summing all levels". A maximum of 3 levels is allowed, including a roof garden, up to 10 meters in height. The FAQ (in English) restates the 105% figure and adds that it "includes roofs, pergolas, and terraces on the land".
Why it moves the decision
On a 600 m² / 6,458 sq ft lot, reading only the 35% figure caps a buyer’s expectation at 210 m² / 2,260 sq ft of house. That is the wrong number. The 105% figure is what a buyer actually gets to build across three levels: 630 m² / 6,781 sq ft of total construction on the same lot, three times the ground-floor figure. Confusing the two understates what the product is by more than half.
How it gets settled
Ask the construction committee (comité técnico, which reviews designs, and comité de vigilancia, which approves them) to confirm the C.U.S. figure applies to your specific lot before commissioning a design: the guideline states some lots carry an individual restriction on frente and fondo ("revisar ficha individual"), which the general table does not capture.
Source: LINEAMIENTOS DE DISEÑO OASIS.pdf (April 2023); FAQs-Eng.pdf, "What is the construction percentage allowed?"
Question 2 of 4
Does the pool count toward that 105%?
The document doesn’t say. It gives the pool a setback, never a coefficient.
Read the reasoning +Close −
The design guideline has a dedicated line for pools: "ALBERCAS: 1.0 mts. min de separación del limite del terreno" (a 1.0-meter minimum setback from the lot line). It says nothing about whether a pool’s surface is counted inside the 35% C.O.S. or the 105% C.U.S. The FAQ’s one line on construction percentage names "roofs, pergolas, and terraces" as included, and does not mention pools either way.
Why it moves the decision
On a lot near the 105% ceiling, a few extra square meters of water either fit inside the allowance or push the design over it. This is exactly the kind of number a buyer’s own architect needs settled before finalizing a design, and the developer’s own paperwork does not settle it. Guessing in either direction and presenting it as fact would be inventing a rule the document never wrote.
How it gets settled
Ask the comité técnico directly, in writing, whether pool surface counts toward C.O.S. and C.U.S. before a design is finalized, and keep the answer with the approved plans: a verbal answer today does not bind the committee that reviews the next owner’s remodel.
Source: LINEAMIENTOS DE DISEÑO OASIS.pdf (April 2023), "RESTRICCIONES DE CONSTRUCCION" table.
Question 3 of 4
What does the condominium regime actually cover here, if this is a lot and not an apartment?
More than the generic ejido-versus-condominium split suggests. Oasis is legally a horizontal condominium, notarized in full.
Read the reasoning +Close −
Escritura Pública número 1,662 (21-Nov-2024, Notaría (notary) Pública 56, Cozumel, Lic. Manuel J. Villanueva Marrufo / Lic. Romina Harsanyi Nacif) formally constitutes "un régimen de propiedad en condominio de 47 unidades privativas exclusivas denominado Condominio Oasis", granted by IPPO KANP, Sociedad Anónima de Capital Variable, through its legal representative Daniel Rodas Cartas. The land itself was acquired by that company on 25-Apr-2023 (Escritura 1,451). Oasis sits inside a larger master regime, "Reglamento del Régimen de Propiedad en Condominio Xpu-Ha Beach" (dated 25-Jun-2021, covering 1,289,259.52 m² of the full development), which Article One defines as lots of land, built horizontally, each with independent access to a common element and to the public road, held by separate owners with individual title to their lot plus co-ownership of the shared elements.
Why it moves the decision
This is not the ejidal or usucapión land tenure that applies to some other lot developments in this catalogue: it is a condominium regime, the same legal instrument used for apartment buildings, applied here to standalone lots with their own street frontage. That matters for financing (see below) and for governance: an owner does not just own dirt, they own an indiviso share (Lot 6’s plan states 2.145%) of everything the condominium holds in common, and building-design approval runs through the condominium’s own committees, not the municipality alone.
How it gets settled
Before closing, confirm the escritura has been inscribed at the Registro Público de la Propiedad of Quintana Roo under the folio real for the specific lot being purchased, not just notarized: a notarized instrument and a registered one are two different stages, and only the second is fully opposable to third parties.
Source: Escritura Regimen Condominio Oasis.pdf (21-Nov-2024); Regimen en condominio Maestro.pdf (25-Jun-2021); lote 6.pdf individual plan.
Question 4 of 4
The maintenance fee: is it $1.50 per m² a year, or $2,500-3,000 pesos a month?
Two developer documents give two different figures, and the FAQ itself says the real number isn’t fixed yet.
Read the reasoning +Close −
The design guideline states the maintenance quota as "1.50 USD / M2 (APROXIMADO) / ANUAL", labeled a "cálculo paramétrico". The FAQ, in the same Drive, answers the question differently: "The maintenance fee will range between $2,500 MXN and $3,000 MXN. The exact value will be defined at the next condominium meeting." One figure is a per-square-meter annual estimate in dollars; the other is a flat monthly range in pesos, and the developer’s own FAQ says the real number is still pending a vote.
Why it moves the decision
On a 600 m² lot, $1.50/m²/year is roughly $900 a year, worlds apart from $2,500-3,000 a month ($30,000-36,000 a year). These are not two ways of stating the same fee: they are off by roughly 30-40x, and the developer has not reconciled them or fixed either one. A buyer budgeting an annual carrying cost off either single document alone would be working from a number the developer itself calls provisional.
How it gets settled
Ask for the minutes of the next condominium meeting once the fee is set, and get it in writing rather than relying on either document above. Until then, budget toward the higher, more recent figure ($2,500-3,000 MXN/month) as the conservative case.
Source: LINEAMIENTOS DE DISEÑO OASIS.pdf, "CUOTA DE MANTENIMIENTO"; FAQs.pdf / FAQs-Eng.pdf, "What is the maintenance fee for my lot?"
You can settle this without them
- Whether Escritura 1,662 is inscribed at the Registro Público de la Propiedad of Quintana Roo, and under which folio real for the specific lot: a public-records search, independent of the developer.
- What earlier phases of the same development are reselling for. Broker listings for Estrella de Mar and Coral, the project’s earliest phases, are public and can be checked against this list without asking the developer anything.
- The municipal authorization behind the condominium regime: Oficio MSOL/SOTMYS/DDUYF/1592/2024 (26-Jun-2024) is cited inside Escritura 1,662 itself and can be requested directly from the Municipio de Solidaridad.
Only they can answer this
- What LOTE TIPO A, B, C and P actually distinguish, since price does not track size across them.
- Whether pool surface counts toward the 105% C.U.S. ceiling, in writing, before finalizing a design.
- The exact maintenance fee, once the condominium meeting referenced in the FAQ sets it.
Everything they shared, counted.
Everything the developer shared for this project, counted below. No construction-progress photo record and no standalone brand-asset file appear: the first doesn’t exist in the shared Drive, the second is broker tooling, not buyer diligence.
As shared by the developer · checked 26-Aug-2026. This declares what exists, it doesn't vouch for what's inside.
Brochure / sales materials
5 files, e.g. Brochure-Xpuha.pdf (ES + EN, print and mobile cuts, plus a broker-specific PDF)
Floor plans
48 files, e.g. lote 1.pdf … lote 47.pdf, one plan per lot, plus AREA COMUN OASIS - ARQ-01.pdf
Price list
1 file, e.g. LISTA DE PRECIOS JULIO26.pdf, all 47 lots, dated July 2026
Legal / trust documentation
5 files, e.g. Escritura 1,662 constituting Condominio Oasis (21-Nov-2024); the Xpuha Beach master condominium regime; Acta Constitutiva; two further escrituras
HOA & fees
2 files, e.g. LINEAMIENTOS DE DISEÑO OASIS.pdf and FAQs.pdf, which disagree
Payment terms
2 files, e.g. Esquemas de Pago (dated June 2026, six payment tiers) and the FAQ’s financing summary
Purchase contract
3 files, e.g. Carta oferta package: individual and corporate purchase-request formats, plus the beneficial-owner declaration
Construction / delivery status
No dated construction-progress file. The FAQ states, in prose, that underground electricity, concrete streets, LED lighting, water, drainage and a treatment plant are already in: a claim, not a dated photo record.
2 smaller gaps, worth knowingopen +close −
What LOTE TIPO A, B, C and P mean. The price list groups every lot into one of four letters, and the letter tracks price more than size does: three type-A lots at 603-618 m² / 6,491-6,652 sq ft all list at a flat $4,800,000 MXN, while type-B lots of the same size run $3,500,000-4,200,000, and the single type-P lot (604 m² / 6,501 sq ft, $5,250,000) is the most expensive in the whole list despite an unremarkable size. Nothing in the shared folder explains what the letters stand for.
The July-2023 individual lot plans cite a different official registration than the November-2024 notarized regime. Lot 6’s own plan header reads "Reg. 008, Sm. 000, Mza. 005, Lote 001", while Escritura 1,662 constituting Condominio Oasis reads "Región 009, Manzana 021, Lote 048". Most likely the plans predate a later re-registration and both describe the same land, but nothing in the folder reconciles the two references directly.
The site and its amenities, photographed and rendered
Aerial photographs and renderings supplied by the developer. Renderings are marked as such in each caption and are not photographs of a finished structure.
We counted the list ourselves. Here is exactly what it shows.
Lots, total
47
Available today
29 of 47
Price range, available lots
$3.5M – $5.25M MXN
Lot size
603 – 660 m² 6,491–7,104 sq ft
Where these figures come from, and how we counted +Close −
LISTA DE PRECIOS JULIO26.pdf color-codes all 47 lots as disponible (available), reservado (reserved) or vendido (sold), with size and price shown only for the available ones. Every one of the 47 lots carries one of the three marks, none left blank: 29 shown as disponible, 18 as vendido, zero as reservado. 18 + 29 = 47, so the count reconciles against the full list. The 18 sold lots carry no size or price in this document, so this analysis cannot state their individual figures; the masterplan render elsewhere on this page shows most of them clustered along the property’s southern and northern edges.
Among the 29 available lots, size runs 603-660 m² and price runs $3,500,000 to $5,250,000 MXN, but the two don’t move together: several 603-618 m² lots (type A) list at a flat $4,800,000, several 604-609 m² lots (type B) list anywhere from $3,500,000 to $4,200,000, and the single 604 m² type-P lot lists at $5,250,000, the highest price on the sheet for one of the smallest lots. Price tracks the developer’s own lot-type letter more than it tracks square meters, and the list does not explain what the letters mean.
At Banxico’s FIX rate of 16.9647 MXN/USD (25-Aug-2026, one rate used throughout this page, our own conversion), the available range runs roughly USD 206,300 to USD 309,500, and the modal price of $4,200,000 MXN converts to roughly USD 247,600. Applying the developer’s own documented coefficients (35% C.O.S., 105% C.U.S.) to the 603-660 m² range available today gives 633-693 m² / 6,814-7,460 sq ft of buildable area across up to three levels: our own calculation from their two published percentages, not a figure either document states directly.
How this one can be paid for
Five ways a property changes hands in Mexico. Which of them are actually open on this project, and what gates the ones that are not. How each one works is a separate page.
- CashOpen
The developer’s own June-2026 payment table gives 100% cash a 30% discount off list, the deepest of any tier, plainly labeled and dated. That is a real, documented figure, not a verbal offer, and it is the strongest negotiating position on a lot that is not under construction and has nothing left for a developer to finance.
- Bank mortgageOpen
Unlike most projects in this catalogue, the blocking condition doesn’t apply here: Escritura Pública 1,662 (21-Nov-2024, Notaría (notary) 56, Cozumel) already constitutes a condominium regime over the 47 units, and the same June-2026 payment table lists "Pago con crédito bancario" as its own line, carrying a 20% discount. A bank still runs its own appraisal and paperwork on the specific lot, but the document that usually stalls a mortgage elsewhere in this catalogue is on file here.
- Developer financingOpen
The best-documented modality on this project. The June-2026 table lays out six tiers: 20% down / 80% financed over 60 months at 10% interest; 30% down / 70% over 36 months interest-free; 40/60 over 36 months with a 10% discount; and 50/50 over 36 months with a 20% discount. The FAQ separately describes "up to 36 months without interest", which matches every tier except the 60-month one, and the reseller network separately advertises financing "up to 3 years without interest", which is the same 36-month claim in different units. Read together, the 60-month, 10%-interest option looks like it was added after the FAQ was written, not a contradiction of it.
- Pre-construction instalmentsNot available here
There is no unit under construction to pay against: the FAQ states the underground electricity, concrete streets, lighting, water, drainage and treatment plant are already installed, and the product being sold is the serviced lot itself, not a home the developer is building. The installment tiers above are direct developer financing on the land price, not progress payments against a build schedule.
- Infonavit / co-financingNot available here
Depends on formal contributions to the Mexican housing system, so it does not exist for a foreign buyer. Worth one check if you are Mexican and worked in Mexico at any point: a housing sub-account can sit unclaimed for years.
Each verdict comes from this project's own dated payment table (June 2026), its FAQ, and its notarized condominium regime, judged against the five ways property changes hands in Mexico. No interest rate appears here except the one the developer itself states (10%, on the 60-month tier only): in bank credit the rate is set by the bank, so it is a fact about your counterparty, not about the market.
Neither the developer’s brochure nor its FAQ publishes a coordinate, only "Carretera Cancún-Tulum, Xpu-Ha, Municipio de Solidaridad". The pin below is FEUDO’s own placement on the published beach point closest to the development’s frontage on Federal Highway 307, cross-checked by routing to Puerto Aventuras and Tulum and comparing against the developer’s own masterplan distances (within 1-2 km of each other). It is a proposed location, not yet confirmed against the specific gated entrance, and should be treated as approximate.
Carretera Federal 307 Cancún-Tulum, Predio San Miguel, Xpu-Ha, Municipio de Solidaridad, Quintana Roo, México
Open the full mapPin: Google Maps place listing for “Oasis Xpu-Ha Beach”, read 28-Aug-2026.
How far to what
- Puerto Aventuras7 km6 min
- Hospiten Riviera Maya, Playa del Carmen24 km17 min
- Playa del Carmen (Centro)26 km21 min
- Tulum (Centro)42 km35 min
- Cancún International Airport (CUN)82 km65 min
Road distances and drive times routed on OpenStreetMap's street network (OSRM) from the pin above, 26-Aug-2026. The developer's own masterplan states 42.2 km to Tulum, 5 km to Puerto Aventuras and 27.4 km to Playa del Carmen from its main access gate, all within 1-2 km of these independently routed figures. Times assume clear roads.
Worth being precise about what sits inside what: Oasis is one 47-lot section inside Xpuha Beach Residential Resort, which is itself one development on the Xpu-Ha stretch of coast, inside the Municipio de Solidaridad. "Xpu-Ha" on its own names a beach and a tourist zone shared by several unrelated hotels and developments; a listing that leans on that name alone is describing the coastline, not this specific gated development.
Start here
Want everything
behind what you just read?
The documents, the ones still missing, and what we would ask before an offer. Independent analysis, not a substitute for the developer’s own disclosure and not a sales pitch.
Or write directly to [email protected]
Tell us what you want to know.
We’ll come back with what the documents confirm, what they don’t, and what we’d ask before an offer.